“They blamed students, but it was us”: the teachers surprised using Chatgpt as a secret weapon while repressing cheating in class

IN A WORD

📚 Teachers More and more rely on digital assistants to manage educational tasks, reshaping traditional teaching methods. 🤖 The use of IA By educators are often not mentioned, which leads to the concerns of students concerning transparency and classy. ⚖️ Universities are preparing ethical frames Manage the role of AI in education, promotion of disclosure and human surveillance. 🔍 Students become able to identify Generated by AI Content, highlighting the need for honest communication on its use.

In recent years, the educational landscape has undergone a deep transformation, teachers are relying more and more on digital assistants to help their functions. This silent change is to reshape the very essence of the transmission of knowledge. This was once a simple wisdom exchange between the teacher and the student is now publicized by artificial intelligence (AI), raising questions about transparency and confidence. Although the integration of AI into education may seem a natural progression in a world focused on technology, it becomes controversial when its use remains hidden from students, which calls into question the fundamental confidence that underpins educational relationships.

Silent automation of teaching practices

The use of artificial intelligence In education is not only a tool for students; Teachers are also increasingly exploiting their capacities to rationalize their workloads. From the creation of teaching materials to the development of quiz and the supply of personalized comments, the presence of AI develops in class. In particular, David Malan in Harvard has developed a chatbot to help his computer lesson, while Katy Pearce at Washington University uses AI formed in his evaluation criteria to help students even progress in his absence.

Despite this progress, some educators choose to keep their use of AI under Wraps. Overwhelmed by classification and time constraints, they delegate certain tasks at AI without disclosure. Rick Arrowood, professor at the Northeastern University, admitted to having used generative tools to create his equipment without examining them in depth or informing his students. By thinking about this, he expressed his regrets about his lack of transparency, wishing that he has better managed the practice.

“These children read in 6 months”: this shocking method of the primary teacher defies 30 years of reading education standards

The use of AI in education sparkles the tensions of students

The non -transparent use of AI by educators led to an increase in discomfort among students. Many note the impersonal style and the repetitive vocabulary of the content generated by AI, encouraging them to become able to identify the artificial texts. This led to cases like that of Ella Stapleton, a student from the Northeast who discovered a direct request for Chatgpt in her course equipment. She filed a complaint and asked for a refund of her tuition fees.

On platforms such as My Professors Rate, criticism of standardized and poorly adapted content rises, students receiving documents such as incompatible with quality education. This feeling of betrayal is increased when students are prohibited from using the same tools. For many, the dependence of teachers at AI means injustice and hypocrisy, fueling additional dissatisfaction.

“It should never have happened”: horrified scientists like the first farm in the world ethical and ecological spark

Ethical frameworks for the use of AI in education

In response to these tensions, several universities establish regulatory executives to govern the role of AI in education. The University of Berkeley, for example, obliges the explicit disclosure of the content generated by the AI, associated with human verification. French institutions follow suit, recognizing that a complete prohibition is no longer possible.

A Tyton Partners survey, quoted by the New York Times, revealed that almost one in three teachers regularly uses AI, but few disclose this to their students. This disparity fuels the conflict, as Paul Shovlin pointed out of the University of Ohio. He maintains that the tool itself is not the problem, but rather how it is integrated. Teachers are still playing a crucial role as a human interlocutors capable of interpretation, evaluation and dialogue.

“China is preparing for war in space”: the HQ-29 missile system can destroy satellites and ballistic threats in the air

Some educators choose to adopt transparency by explaining and regulating their use of AI, using it to improve interactions. Although always a minority, this approach could open the way to the reconciliation of educational innovation with restored confidence.

While we sail on this evolving educational landscape, the balance between technology and transparency remains an urgent concern. How can educators and institutions work together to ensure that IA integration rather improves educational experience?

This article is based on sources verified and supported by editorial technologies.

Have you enjoyed? 4.5 / 5 (30)