Does AI destroy education? The alarming impact on American classrooms | Amac

by Finn Patraic

When you buy through links on our site, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. However, this does not influence our evaluations.

The American education system has an important and growing problem – students are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI) as a substitute for real learning, and teachers do not know what to do on this subject.

IBM define AI as “a technology that allows computers and machines to simulate human learning, understanding, problem solving, decision -making, creativity and autonomy”. AI technology, for example, can be used to “better interpret imagery results” and treat the doctor's notes, according to Harvard medical school.

When tools fueled by AI like Chatgpt first broke into the stage a few years ago, they were very promising for education. And indeed, in the right application, AI can be a powerful tool to allow personalized learning and tutoring and to provide instant comments to students.

But more and more students also use it to write articles and even cheat tests while more and more schools are moving to online exams.

“All you have to do is copy and stick the questions with multiple choice, or take a photo so that it converts from the cat to the text, then glue it in chatppt, and out of the multiple answers, he gives you the right one and explains why”, a university student recently said The collegiate solution. The student from the College of Staten Island admitted having received an “A” on two different final exams after using the Chatppt.

New research has confirmed that AI programs such as Chatgpt can be used to achieve complex courses such as engineering. Researchers from the University of Illinois “noted that Chatgpt had obtained a passing note in the course without much engineering, but the cat bot has not demonstrated or understanding high -level concepts”, according to a May 19 in the upper interior article. In another recent development, Google's Gemini 2.5 AI brand 49% in the Mathematics Olympiad test – better than 75% of students who have passed the test, a population made up of the best young mathematical spirits in the country.

Students also use AI to write articles, creating real concerns that schools produce graduates without real literacy skills. The Turnitin.com plagiarism detection site revised More than 200 million articles written by high school and college students have found that millions of these articles were probably generated mainly through AI. Another study examined 10,000 tests of university scholarships and found that 42% had probably been composed using a generative AI.

In some cases, the papers written by AI are easy to spot, because AI programs are known to generate “hallucinated” or “ghosts” quotes, evoking the fake slim sources. Chatgpt, for example, created false stories Teachers accused of sexual assault and have cited legitimate media. In another rather ironic case, an self -proclaimed “expert” disinformation “created a legal file which included false quotes After Chatgpt filled the reserved spaces, drawing a reprimand from a minnesota judge.

At New York University, a professor said that he had “experienced his assignments,” said Daily mail. The teacher discovered that his students used AI when asked an extension on a mission “because” Chatgpt was down the day the duty was due, “reported the Daily Mail.

However, as AI technology is advancing, the student problem based on computers to reflect for them will only get worse. Barely a few years ago, AI could only produce caricatural approximations of images and videos. NOW, hyper-realistic AI videos are everywhere on the internet. The same type of progress occurs with written material, increasingly blurring the line between the content generated by humans and generated by AI.

But it is not only the teachers who fight against their own students using AI – sometimes the confrontation occurs in the other direction.

A student from the Northeast University recently requested a reimbursement from her school after discovering that her teacher used AI in a contradiction of her own policy.

Ella Stapleton dug in her teacher's equipment “and discovered other AI -revealing signs: distorted text, photos of office workers with parts of the foreign body and blatant errors”, ” according to has The New York Times.

“He tells us not to use it, then he uses it himself,” she said. Students, the Times Underlines: “Make a financial argument: they often pay a lot to be taught by humans, not an algorithm that they could also consult for free.”

The instructor apologized for the way he used AI and said he would be more transparent in the future. Stapleton did not receive the refund.

These stories illustrate the need for a more robust conversation in the place of AI in education and how to protect yourself against students and teachers while enjoying. The University of Pennsylvania has offered advice here, adage That teachers and students should “be transparent” and “disclose” how AI was used. The Northern Illinois University has Other policies Who describe positive means to use AI, such as papers rereading, brainstorming ideas or “information search”.

In the end, however, schools may be required to change their teaching models to adapt to the proliferation of AI. The reality is that the openings of integrity and “transparency” are probably not very lucky against the attraction of a website which can do the work of a student for them in a few seconds.

Ironically, the answer can be a return to more traditional schooling methods – handwritten assignments, tests in person on paper and mobile phones and other electronic devices out of classrooms. To preserve authentic learning and intellectual growth, schools may need to unplug technologies as the wave of the future.

The contributor Amac Newsline Matt Lamb is deputy editor -in -chief of the Fix college. He previously worked for students for Life of America, students for life and USA turning point. He previously interned to open books. His writing also appeared in Washington's examiner, the federalist, the Lifesitenews, the Revue de la vie human, the leaders of the United States and other points of sale. The opinions expressed are his. Follow it @ Mattlamb22 on X.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.