A detailed exploration – track2training

By Shashikant Nishant Sharma

THE Field theory of figure is a fundamental concept in urban conception which helps to analyze and understand the relationship between Constructed forms (figures) and the Open spaces (land) who surround and define them. Rooted in the principles of the psychology of gestalt and architectural morphology, this theory provides a visual and analytical method to interpret the urban fabric by distinguishing Solid mass (buildings) Since Videes (open spaces). It plays a crucial role in understanding spatial organization, connectivity, enclosure and the overall quality of urban environments.

---

1. Origin and conceptual base

The term “figure-terrain” was initially used in gestalismwhere he referred to the human perception of visual elements as the object of focus (figure) or the background (earth). In urban conception, this concept has been adopted and developed in particular by theorists as Colin Rowe and Fred Koetterespecially in their influential work “City collage” (1978), where they highlighted the importance of the ground diagram appearing as an urban space analysis tool.

In an urban context:

• Figure = The elements built, such as buildings, monuments or blocks.
• Ground = The space open around and between these constructed forms, including the streets, the squares, the parks and the courses.

---

2. Objective and utility in urban design

The theory of the Field of Fivest is used for several ends in the practice and pedagogy of urban design:

A. Analysis of the spatial hierarchy

The theory reveals how different types of spaces are ordered in a city – courses closely closed in large -scale places. This helps to understand:

• Public against private space
• Dominant structures vs subordinate
• Secondary VS primary networks (for example, the main streets vs)

B. Understand urban morphology

Thanks to figurative diagrams, designers and planners can trace the Evolution of urban formassess the Compactness or sprawl development and assess density And grain (fine or coarse) of urban models.

C. Evaluation of connectivity and accessibility

The arrangement of constructed forms and open spaces reveals how Pedestrian and vehicle flows function. A balanced field relationship improves acceleration,, visual continuityAnd social interactionwhile imbalances can cause segregation,, inaccessibilityOr monotony.

D. guide urban design interventions

By studying the figure-ground relationships, designers can:

• Identify the underused spaces for filling or revitalization.
• Propose new developments that respect or improve the existing spatial structure.
• Create more legible,, consistentAnd significant urban environments.

---

3. Sun diagram as a tool

THE plan is the main tool used to view and interpret this theory. It is generally a black and white card:

• Black (or plain color) = Constructed forms (figure)
• White (or negative space) = Open spaces (soil)

This simplified abstraction helps:

• Eliminate non -essential elements to focus only on space relationships.
• Compare the urban blocks in different cities or historical periods.
• Evaluate the conditions of the enclosure, the opening and the edges.

Example::

• A traditional European city center (like Rome or Paris) often shows a high degree of equilibrium of the ground appearing – with a dense network of constructed forms interspersed with open squares and well -defined open streets.
• A modernist development (like the Radiant City of Le Corbusier) often shows dispersed buildings floating in open spaces, which leads to a lower land ratio and a reduced spatial definition.

---

4. Applications and implications

A. Historical preservation and urban filling

Field studies can help preserve the character of historical nuclei By guiding sensitive filling projects that maintain existing spatial cereals and hierarchy.

B. Transit oriented development (TOD)

TOD areas often require compact, connected and mixed use. Field theory is used to guarantee density,, pregnantAnd Human scale design in such developments.

C. Urban readability and imageability

According to the concepts of Kevin Lynch in “The image of the city”, Figure-SOL relationships contribute to the way people can read and sail clearly in the city. A strong spatial definition improves the mental card urban inhabitants.

D. Durable and livable design

Space ratios built with well proportioned opens can influence microclimate,, social interaction,, securityAnd accelerationwhich all contribute to urban sustainability and inhabitants.

---

5. Limits and criticisms

Although the theory of the Figure Figure is a powerful tool, it also has limits:

• Oversimplification: It reduces complex spatial realities to binary visuals, ignoring the heights of the building, uses and materials.
• Contextual blindness: He may not understand the socio -cultural dynamics, economic conditions or lived experiences of urban space.
• Static representation: The diagrams are snapshots in time and do not reflect time changeslike seasonal use or variation in the day-night.

To overcome them, the analysis of the Figure Figure is often supplemented by Section drawings,, land use cards,, 3D modelsAnd behavioral studies.

---

6. Conclusion

THE Field theory of figure remains a Basic analytical framework in urban design. It distills the city in its fundamental – solid and empty space components – allowing planners and designers of read,, compareAnd shape urban form with greater clarity. Although simple in its graphic expression, it offers deep information on the organization, readability and quality of urban spaces. When integrated into other design tools and socio -cultural analysis, it becomes an invaluable method for making cities that are both functional and human.

References

Grossberg, S. (1994). 3D vision and soil separation from the visual cortex. Perception and psychophysics,, 55(1), 48-121.

Hebbert, M. (2016). Figure-Terrain: History and practice of a planning technique. Urban Planning Review,, 87(6), 705-728.

Roberts, LD (1986). The ground model appearing for the explanation of the determination of the indexing reference. Synthesis441-486.

Wever, for example (1927). Figure and soil in the visual perception of form. The American Journal of Psychology,, 38(2), 194-226.