In the AI Strategic Work, I use a simple framework, asking “what can you do in a unique way?”, In addition to asking “what should everyone do?”
It is not difficult to get answers to these questions, but it is worth exploring what these answers sometimes show. The second question is the simplest, but the answers tend to be more generic, or less useful in a concrete sense. I often see things like “experiment more”, “be curious” and “learn” – general truths at any time of change, but also things that are culturally difficult in the best of cases, and responses that are not specific to the context of generator.
“What can you do only?” Is this the most difficult question, because it is defined by the absence: of all of your brilliance, what else can no one offer?
Most likely, the answer does not concern specific knowledge (unless you are a researcher, original knowledge or a practitioner with a unique experience to share), but rather a perspective or a lens. Or maybe “nothing” is the most valid answer, or at least very acceptable.
The role of leaders May not have “answers” to the best time, and it is better “no answer”, than parrot the answer you found on LinkedIn.
I do not know: perhaps Genai, by its nature, and with its speed of penetration, requires in-depth expertise or a diversified application. Not “management” or generic knowledge. There may be an average space for interconnection: manufacturing links and translation. It is, after all, a basic role in innovation.
At Learnopoly, Finn has championed a mission to deliver unbiased, in-depth reviews of online courses that empower learners to make well-informed decisions. With over a decade of experience in financial services, he has honed his expertise in strategic partnerships and business development, cultivating both a sharp analytical perspective and a collaborative spirit. A lifelong learner, Finn’s commitment to creating a trusted guide for online education was ignited by a frustrating encounter with biased course reviews.