More and more I find my work transporting me Systems edgesand question the validity, or the universality of boundaries. In this, I think I push on my own understanding, which has been in motion for some time.
In the work of original social leadership, I described that in terms of “formal” leadership and our “social” leadership, as if they were sitting next to each other. Since then, I have evolved my language, to describe social leadership as occurring at the intersection of formal and social systems “. I therefore no longer describe it as purely” next “, but in a way permeable or bleeding in formal space.
It is not a superposition, not above the formal, but rather the edges of the systems have changed in their nature.
There are parallels in other parts of my disparate work: in ‘Socially dynamic organization“, I describe that we will need more” permeable “organizations to knowledge, capacities and stories”. Those who can selectively open gaps in the walls. Of course, we must still be “safe”, but security does not always concern ramparts and separation. Security can also be maintained in adaptation, resilience and change.
This strongly implies that we still need validation, property and separation mechanisms, but they may not be as clearly defined as before. Or their property, or the supervision, may be different.
For example: as a leader today, we direct in the arms of our communities, and these communities transcend the Structural organization. This does not mean that we carry out trade secrets around the world, but rather that our conversations in these communities directly support our capacity in the four walls of the organization. It is not only access to ideas, but rather to the creation of deep meaning and to the creation of a precious meaning. We are not only leaving the fortress to find ideas, we leave it to create “meaning” around these ideas.
Another change in my language was to describe the “formal” organization instead as “structural organization”, recognizing that the codified structure is a characteristic of differentiation of this (social organization is defined by the networks of power, confidence, etc., no infrastructure).
If I take the most widely objective, I think that means that my global understanding of the organization is fully encapsulated by the ‘Ecosystem“See, and that inside, it is the dynamic relationships between the hard landscape, and the many co-dependent relationships that surround it, which really matters. Thus, in some respects, the structural organization has become somewhat vague for me, because I see most of the aspects of efficiency and excellence as beyond. Multidimensional, not a dimension.
At Learnopoly, Finn has championed a mission to deliver unbiased, in-depth reviews of online courses that empower learners to make well-informed decisions. With over a decade of experience in financial services, he has honed his expertise in strategic partnerships and business development, cultivating both a sharp analytical perspective and a collaborative spirit. A lifelong learner, Finn’s commitment to creating a trusted guide for online education was ignited by a frustrating encounter with biased course reviews.