As artificial intelligence (AI) (AI) becomes more accessible, more students will use it and more teachers include software in their classrooms. As an becoming of education, AI offers many advantages, including personalized lessons and immediate support. While some believe that the immersion of this new tool will increase the quantities of cheating, the reality is the opposite.
Personalized lessons. Automatic feedback. Effective study tools. Free.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is the future of education. From the generation of images to learn more about a subject that tickles your fantasy, this powerful software can be used for many different purposes. Among these is its most crucial element: the ability to help and allow students to learn more effectively and more effectively.
Although the extreme potential of AI in education is unrivaled, some do not share the same enthusiasm and have a variety of concerns. Many will worry about students will abuse the tool, using it to write their tests and answer Quiz questions, As indicated by Dr Timothy MarkleyA main director of student defense, while others believe that his presence and his easily accessible information will harm the skills of critical reflection.
Critical thinking is a crucial tool for the real world. It allows students to analyze information, train judgments and connect their results to their environment. It is essential for the growth and success of students, but the only way to exploit these skills is by practice, and with AI, this practice will be different.
Search led by Microsoft suggests that integrating AI into classrooms can decrease critical thinking skills and lead to excessive increase. Although this is true, AI will only cause a reduction in critical thinking skills if it is used in an incorrect and reflection manner, as shown Avid Open Access.
Like many things in life, exercise, apply for college and find a job, you have to do things well to get the best results. “It's not the plane, it's the pilot,” said Bradley “Rooster” Bradshaw “Top Gun: Maverick. “The AI is no different. To see a positive result and a growth in critical thinking skills, students must ask the right questions, analyze the answers and not take what is given to them for its nominal value.
While some students will use the tool to learn, others will use it to cheat, which has increased the error that the simple presence of AI platforms prompted mass participation in academic dishonesty. Although this is considered to be a public notoriety, this is not true, because the data of Stanford Higher School of Education proves the opposite.
In the front chatgpt surveys was published to the public, 60% to 70% of students participated in cheating behaviorAccording to Stanford's education specialists, Victor Lee and Denise Pope. When a similar survey, which included new questions on the use of AI, was carried out again in 2025, Lee and Pope found that the percentages were similar, if not less.
AI only made it easier for students. However, he did not encourage more students to cheat, as Lee and the Pope prove. In most cases, cheating has little relation to access to technology and more with other factors such as high pressure or lack of understanding.
Not all students who cheat do not use AI, and all students who use AI. Although some students can use this software without integrity, the reality is that AI does not cause more cheating but rather helps to extinguish the desire for students' knowledge.
Like everything else, there will be different perspectives and opinions. Some will refuse to incorporate AI into their teaching and to worry about its negative impacts, while others will do the opposite, kissing its potential.
With its constantly evolving nature, we do not know what the future of AI is, but unlike AI, the future of education is known. The future of education is AI.

Finn founded Learnopoly to provide unbiased, in-depth online course reviews, helping learners make informed choices. With a decade in financial services, he developed strategic partnerships and business development expertise. After a frustrating experience with a biased course review, Finn was inspired to create a trusted learning resource.